L-Systems¶
This model demonstrates generative morphology through parallel rewriting.
An L-system is a grammar that grows. Starting from an axiom, each iteration rewrites all symbols at once. The final drawing is a developmental history made visible.
Idea¶
Example:
After several iterations, the string becomes long enough to draw a branching plant.
The important point is that the form is not placed into the system from outside. It is generated by repeated local replacement rules.
Connection to the Repository¶
| L-system concept | Repository concept |
|---|---|
| Axiom | Seed state / initial identity |
| Production rule | Learning or memory curation rule |
| Iteration | Developmental time |
| Branching | Divergent but constrained possibility space |
| Stack push/pop | Temporary context and return to prior state |
This complements IFS:
- IFS asks how repeated functions converge to an attractor.
- L-systems ask how repeated rules build a history-dependent morphology.
Run¶
cd simulation-models/emergent-dynamics/l-systems
python3 l_systems.py --preset plant --iterations 5 --output plant.png
Presets:
plantkochsierpinski
The script prints growth metrics and writes a PNG.
What It Shows¶
- small local rewriting rules generate large structured forms,
- iteration depth changes morphology nonlinearly,
- form can carry history.
What It Does Not Show¶
- that plants, minds, or societies are literally L-systems,
- that any generated branching form is intelligent,
- that grammar alone is enough for selfhood.
The useful claim is narrower: development can be modeled as constrained rewriting over time.